Telecommunications Services CP-8
Contingency Planning · Moderate baseline ✗ Not implemented
Status — program-wide
What references this control
No risks name this control in their Framework field yet.
No policies reference it yet.
Link a risk or policy to this control
Attaching adds CP-8 to the item's Framework field; the ✨ AI button suggests the best match. You can also edit the Framework field on a risk / policy directly.
Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev.5, Contingency Planning family NIST SP 800-53 Rev.5. The baseline shows the lowest SP 800-53B baseline (Low / Moderate / High) this control appears in NIST SP 800-53B.
Control guide — plain-English, per NIST SP 800-53
CP-8 (Telecommunications Services) is about making sure the network links your system depends on can survive an outage. It asks you to arrange alternate telecommunications service — a second way for the system to communicate — along with the agreements needed so essential functions can resume within a set time when the primary connection is unavailable at either your main site or your backup site. It is a Contingency Planning control that appears at the Moderate baseline.
What good looks like
- Map the dependency — list the essential functions and the network links each one needs, including the primary uplink, internal routing, and the Domain Name System (DNS, which turns names into addresses).
- Arrange an alternate service so the system can resume operations within a defined recovery time when the primary link is down.
- Put agreements in place with priority-of-service provisions so your service is restored ahead of others in an emergency (enhancement CP-8(1)).
- Remove single points of failure — route the alternate service over a separate path and, where you can, a separate provider (enhancements CP-8(2) and CP-8(3)).
- Test the alternate service on a schedule so you know it actually carries traffic before you need it (enhancement CP-8(5)).
Framework mapping
- NIST CSF 2.0 — PR.IR-03 — Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
- CIS Controls v8 — Control 17 — Incident response management — define mechanisms for communicating during incident response (Safeguard 17.6)
How to move it toward Implemented
- Write a one-page telecommunications plan: the network links you depend on (primary and backup uplinks), the recovery time objective (RTO — how fast communications must be back), and any alternate-service agreement or priority-of-service arrangement.
- Add a second network path with automatic failover — give the backup route a higher metric so traffic reroutes on its own (for example
ip route add default via <gateway> dev <iface> metric 200, or set connection priorities innetplanor NetworkManager). - Add a second name resolver so lookups survive one provider failing — list more than one server in
/etc/systemd/resolved.conf(DNS=andFallbackDNS=) or in/etc/resolv.conf. - Test the failover and log it — take the primary link down (
ip link set <iface> down), confirm essential services stay reachable over the backup, bring it back up, and save a dated result file. - Attach that plan and the dated failover-test result as hardening evidence on the asset, naming
CP-8in the Requirement field — that moves it from ‘To assess’ toward ‘Completed’.